Prime UK legislation agency’s money-laundering protection hinges on awkwardness: ‘In Europe, in my tradition, we don’t try this. You don’t ask err, how a lot do you make?’


A prime legislation agency confronted allegations that it broke UK money-laundering guidelines by being too well mannered to ask a politically related banker from a former Soviet republic how he acquired his money.

Dentons overrode an inner warning urging “excessive warning” in coping with him as a shopper and did not ask the banker the place his wealth got here from in case it is likely to be “impertinent or rude,” authorized regulators had alleged at a London court docket. Whereas the tribunal dismissed the case Monday, discovering no breach of the business watchdog’s ideas, it did discover proof of shortcomings concerning money-laundering guidelines. 

The banker, who can’t be recognized attributable to a court docket order, had spent tens of tens of millions of kilos on London property and a member of the family is now the topic of a separate police probe. Dentons fought the case on the tribunal, arguing that it took “ample measures” to determine the banker’s supply of funds. Attorneys for the agency mentioned it knew that the shopper held a “substantial shareholding” in a state-controlled financial institution. 

“We acknowledge that danger administration and regulatory compliance requires fixed vigilance and a focus and, for the reason that interval in query, we’ve considerably enhanced our capabilities and procedures,” the agency mentioned in a press release.

The regulator’s lawsuit is one in every of only a small variety of instances scrutinizing the position {of professional} providers in enabling the stream of illicit finance into Britain. Few instances go to trial within the UK regardless of the police estimating that a whole lot of billions of kilos are laundered by way of the UK yearly.

The banker grew to become a shopper of Dentons in 2013 after an acquisition of a smaller agency, and was instantly recognized as a “politically uncovered individual” — a time period used to ascribe a better stage of danger and one which places the onus on the agency to scrutinize transactions. However Dentons by no means requested the banker for his wage or the the scale of his shareholding within the financial institution.

Dentons lawyer Francois Chateau, now based mostly in New York, instructed the Solicitors Regulation Authority in an interview that he by no means requested the banker how a lot he earned. 

“In Europe, in my tradition, we don’t try this. You don’t ask err, how a lot do you make?” in accordance with Chateau. He mentioned he’d by no means requested anyone to point out him their checking account and to provide proof of what they personal that might be “seen for everyone to see.”

The regulator known as Chateau’s solutions “astonishing,” saying that he adopted an “terribly credulous perspective in the direction of people of apparently spectacular wealth.”

Dentons, which has places of work all through the world, mentioned the regulator wasn’t focusing on any people, saying it had accepted that “nobody on the agency dedicated any rule breach, or at the very least none critical sufficient to warrant prosecution.” 

It mentioned Chateau knew the banker “was a rich man who was very profitable in finance, that he was identified for being against corruption and that he was extraordinarily properly related.” A spokesman declined to touch upon Chateau.

Dentons continued with preserving the banker as a shopper even after the agency’s normal counsel mentioned in 2014 that it shouldn’t proceed working for him.

Dentons’ attorneys mentioned even when the agency had breached money-laundering guidelines then its conduct wasn’t sufficiently critical to benefit any type of penalty. 

The regulator will await a written judgment earlier than deciding on any steps, a spokesman mentioned. 

Subscribe to the brand new Fortune CEO Weekly Europe e-newsletter to get nook workplace insights on the largest enterprise tales in Europe. Enroll totally free.